What changes on paid plans

OpenAI has doubled the usage limits on some of its paid plans, according to The Decoder. The changes concern the Work and Codex quotas on the Pro 100 and Pro 500 plans, both of which receive double the previous allocation. On the Pro 200 plan, the company doubled the lower quota and scrapped a planned cut after user protests. The Plus plan, by contrast, remains unchanged.

According to the source, new subscriptions already include the updated quotas and existing customers receive them automatically. The company notes, however, that doubling a quota does not amount to doubling the number of tasks completed, because consumption varies by model, task type, and chosen settings. The expanded limits for the new Dots also remain in effect for now, but their usage is tracked separately.

Model efficiency and usable capacity

OpenAI says it will continue to release better models and efficiency gains to push usable capacity higher. The company recently published the 6.1 Terra and Sol models, described as much more efficient and able to match or surpass their predecessors. This is a company statement, not an independently verified fact in the available material.

The central point is that the increase in quotas should not be read as a simple doubling of productivity for the user. If the latest models consume fewer resources to perform the same tasks, actual capacity could grow by more than the nominal quotas, but the source provides no quantitative measures to support this conclusion. It therefore remains to be seen how much the claimed efficiency translates into greater practical capacity.

The challenge with Anthropic and the limits of the information

The decision comes shortly before preparations for Anthropic's IPO, according to The Decoder, as both companies compete hard for dominance in the B2B artificial intelligence market. The timing link is indicated by the source, but the material does not clarify whether the quota increase is a direct response to the listing or an independent product choice.

No data are available on the number of customers involved, the economic impact of the changes, or the exact timing of Anthropic's IPO. The scale of the user protest over Pro 200 is also not quantified. These elements remain to be verified before assessing the competitive effects of the move.

Source and attribution: this original summary was prepared by AICronaca based on the report by The Decoder ↗. The statements are attributed to the source; possible information limitations: The material is based on a single article from The Decoder and on statements by OpenAI. It contains no independent data on costs, number of users, or results of the efficiency of the Terra and Sol models. The link to Anthropic's IPO is presented by the source as temporal context, not as a demonstrated causal relationship..